NASA delays crewed Artemis missions to 2027 due to faulty heat shield

zohaibahd

Posts: 657   +16
Staff
In brief: NASA has announced another delay in its highly anticipated Artemis program, which aims to return astronauts to the Moon. The agency revealed that it has identified an issue with the heat shield on the Orion spacecraft, the crew capsule designed to transport astronauts to and from the Moon during future Artemis missions.

During the uncrewed Artemis I mission that orbited the Moon last year, NASA discovered that the heat shield retained more heat in its outer layers than anticipated during re-entry into Earth's atmosphere.

This excess heat caused gases to become trapped, building up internal pressure and leading to cracking and uneven shedding of the outer heat shield layer. Such an issue is far from ideal when a capsule carrying astronauts is hurtling through the atmosphere at 25,000 mph.

NASA has proposed a fix: adjusting Orion's re-entry trajectory to slow the spacecraft down more gradually. However, implementing this solution requires yet another schedule adjustment. The Artemis II mission, originally slated to carry a crew on a lunar flyby in late 2025, has now been postponed to April 2026.

As for the pivotal Artemis III mission – intended to land the first woman and the next man on the Moon, marking humanity's return to the lunar surface since Apollo 17 in 1972 – it has been delayed from September 2026 to at least mid-2027.

In a post on X, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson put a positive spin on the latest setback, saying "The Artemis campaign is the most daring, technically challenging, collaborative, international endeavor humanity has ever set out to do. And we are committed to ensuring that when we go, we go safely. That's what today's decision is about – and how Artemis succeeds."

The Artemis II crew – Commander Reid Wiseman, pilots Victor Glover and Christina Koch, and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen – appear to be taking the delay in stride. Wiseman expressed gratitude for NASA's transparent decision-making, stating that the crew is "thankful for the openness of NASA to weigh all options and make decisions in the best interest of human spaceflight."

This marks just the latest in a series of delays for the embattled Artemis program. Originally, the first uncrewed Artemis I mission around the Moon was scheduled for 2016. Yet, a host of technical challenges and budgetary constraints pushed that milestone back by six years, with the mission finally taking place in late 2022.

Permalink to story:

 
There's also serious discussion about canceling SLS going on right now, which is probably a good thing.
Even if they canceled right now we would prob launch another 2-3 SLS flights since the contracts are done and they are being built atm. But they could use a falcon heavy to launch a transfer stage, and a New Glenn to launch Orion into LEO to dock with the transfer stage, this would prob cost less than $200 million compared to SLS being over $500 million just for the launch side of a mission.

This delay also give SpaceX more time to work on starship and the in orbit refueling and Blue Origin to get there lander sorted and New Glenn up and running.
 
Even if they canceled right now we would prob launch another 2-3 SLS flights since the contracts are done and they are being built atm. But they could use a falcon heavy to launch a transfer stage, and a New Glenn to launch Orion into LEO to dock with the transfer stage, this would prob cost less than $200 million compared to SLS being over $500 million just for the launch side of a mission.

This delay also give SpaceX more time to work on starship and the in orbit refueling and Blue Origin to get there lander sorted and New Glenn up and running.
Given that Trump will, in theory, be in office for the next 4-years, I doubt the program will get cancelled. Though I don't agree with almost all of his views, manned exploration of space has not received as much funding as it should have going forward from the Apollo days, IMO.

Starship is on a critical path for moon and beyond missions, and definitely needs more work although its getting better. Let's hope Musk does not turn it into another "Cybertruck" experience.

Interesting that they found problems with the heat shield so sending the capsule back without astronauts was a wise decision, IMO. Boeing, yes I know they have a bad reputation right now, will get it sorted out.
 
Interesting that they found problems with the heat shield so sending the capsule back without astronauts was a wise decision, IMO. Boeing, yes I know they have a bad reputation right now, will get it sorted out.

That was Starliner Boeings LEO capsule for commercial crew program to service the ISS. SLS launches Orion which uses a different heatsheild designed for the faster de-orbit from lunar transfers and is made by Lockheed Martin. Orion did an uncrewed mission to Lunar orbit in 2022 and the heatshield inspection after return showed higher damage than expected.
 
"The Artemis campaign is the most daring, technically challenging, collaborative, international endeavor humanity has ever set out to do. And we are committed to ensuring that when we go, we go safely. That's what today's decision is about – and how Artemis succeeds."

While I applaud the commitment to manned space flights, this comment is simply an outright lie. The US, without any international aid, has already put people on the moon! To claim that this is the greatest international endeavour is simply insane.

I'd be more inclined with saying that the collaborative development of various vaccines would be far more daring - not to mention just a tad more useful to the human race as a whole.
 
Oh yes… funny how all these things were not a problem in the 60’s… makes you wonder doesn't it??
Its a different craft with a fundamentally different job to do. If you are curious about what problems were faced in the 1960's, see if you can find a copy of a six-part series called "Moon Machines". Your local library might have a copy.

Over 500,000 people worked on the Apollo program. I highly doubt there are anywhere near that many people working on the SLS/Artemis now. SLS/Artemis also does not enjoy the favor that Apollo had. Apollo had the advantage of the cold-war competition with the Soviets.
SpaceX has issue, worked out in a month or two. NASA has issue, delay at least a year.
Um, No. SpaceX is not full of miracle workers. If it were, "Starship" would be ready now and would not have faced so many problems in its test flights/developments as it has - IMO.

The fact remains, from the 1960's, space travel is very difficult, and it is a priority to keep any and all astronauts that might fly on the new crop of vehicles alive.
 
Back