Internet Archive ends effort to overturn defeat in digital book lending case

A hot potato: After being defeated in court, the Internet Archive has now decided to stop pursuing the legal route in its fight over digital book lending. The nonprofit will comply with the Second Circuit's verdict, restricting users' choice of digital books at publishers' request.

In a recent post on its official blog, the Internet Archive (IA) confirmed that the "Hachette v. Internet Archive" case has finally come to an end. The organization, founded in 1996, is "deeply disappointed" with the recent verdict by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but has decided not to ask the US Supreme Court for a review of the case.

Major US publishers sued the IA over its Controlled Digital Lending (CDL) system, a lending program where users could "borrow" digital copies of the physical books purchased by the organization over the years. The number of digital copies available for lending was the same as the copies owned by the IA, though this restriction was partially relaxed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conventional libraries can provide a similar lending service, but they do so after paying publishers a licensing fee. The Internet Archive tried to argue that the fees were too expensive, claiming that low-income users were benefiting from its program. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ultimately sided with publishers, forcing the Archive to remove 500,000 books from CDL and pay an undisclosed sum to finally settle the case.

The IA now says it will continue to honor the agreement with the Association of American Publishers (AAP), removing specific books from its lending service after receiving a direct request from an AAP member. The Archive tried to recruit readers, authors and alternative publishers in its crusade for free digital lending, sending AAP a petition with more than 120,000 signatures to warn about the detrimental effects of the case.

The Archive is still standing despite the legal setbacks and the massive hack it suffered over the past few weeks. Chris Freeland, IA's Director of Library Services, confirmed the organization will keep advocating for a more accessible digital book marketplace. Internet Archive founder Brewster Kahle initially warned that publishers could destroy the organization. He also cautioned that the lawsuit could bring other digital libraries to a halt.

Now that the Hachette v. Internet Archive case has come to an end, the IA will hopefully go back to preserving huge amounts of digital artifacts like it has been doing for years now. The Archive provides much more than just ebooks, and the number of curious or historically significant collections acquired by the organization continues to grow.

Permalink to story:

Internet Archive ends effort to overturn defeat in digital book lending case

The Internet Archive tried to argue that the fees were too expensive, claiming that low-income users were benefiting from its program. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ultimately sided with publishers, forcing the Archive to remove 500,000 books from CDL and pay an undisclosed sum to finally settle the case.

Click to expand...

It's kind of funny that they were hoping for sympathy for poor people from the US government.
They should read more books.

Copyright I believe had a 75 year life span cause they cried over the fact 'gone with the wind' was going to be out of copyright and a free for all in theory. Public domain.
Greed wins again. Any excuse to milk it.
And this stops people in theory building upon, saving older works because they don't have the rights to preserve historical pieces, so some can fall by the wayside.
They extended copyright to 95 years.
Dumb people, doing dumb things.
Should have decreased it by 25.
How many people are going to watch Gone with the wind, or want to read wizard of oz? 4 people out of 4billion? Really wtf are these people thinking.
Such a pointless futile fight. And they won't be arguing in actors favors when it comes to their digital rights and AI movies. I bet actors and actresses will struggle with contracts over the next few years and legal loopholes. Not that I'm worried about their overpaid asses. Copyright like money should be about people getting paid fairly for their work, but in capitalism and free markets where people are overpaid in the first place I find it hard to care about their BS issues.
Let people have access to older titles, they are mostly educational and historical property at that point.

Humanity continues to makes its irrelevance to the universe apparent.