Ubisoft stock surges following Tencent and Guillemot buyout discussions

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 285   +7
Staff
Editor's take: What would happen if Ubisoft were actually acquired, as current rumors suggest? Speculation is that a new owner would redirect it to produce fewer, but more commercially viable games and scrap some of its niche projects in favor of established franchises. There is no way to know for sure, but the market certainly favors the prospect of a buyout.

Last week Bloomberg reported that, according to people familiar with the matter, Tencent Holdings and the Guillemot family are exploring options for Ubisoft, including a potential buyout. The parties likely were not happy with the leak, but it ultimately provided a much-needed boost for the French video game developer, which has lost over half its market value this year. Following the story, Ubisoft's shares surged by 33 percent in Paris, marking the steepest gain since the company's initial public offering in 1996.

Ubisoft, known for its Assassin's Creed franchise, has seen its shares fall by about 40 percent this year, reaching their lowest point in over a decade last month. The company's market capitalization now stands at approximately €1.8 billion ($2 billion).

Tencent and the Guillemot Brothers have been consulting with advisers to find ways to stabilize Ubisoft and increase its value. One possibility under consideration is taking the company private.

Currently, Tencent owns 9.2 percent of Ubisoft's net voting rights, while the Guillemot family holds about 20.5 percent. Some minority shareholders, including AJ Investments, have been pushing for either privatization or a sale to a strategic investor.

The discussions are still in early stages, and there's no guarantee they will result in a transaction. Both Tencent and the Guillemot family are also considering other alternatives, Bloomberg said.

Ubisoft has been struggling for a few years after facing intense development pressures during the pandemic. This led to setbacks in launching new titles and the cancellation of some projects in development.

In 2022, there was significant merger and acquisition activity in the gaming sector, with reports that major private equity firms were evaluating potential offers for Ubisoft. Subsequently, the company's founding family entered into a partnership agreement with Tencent, which acquired a 49.9 percent stake in Guillemot Brothers, in addition to its direct stake in Ubisoft. This move was seen as a strategy to keep potential buyers at bay while allowing the Guillemot family to maintain control of Ubisoft's governance.

Ubisoft had been counting on Star Wars Outlaws to be a huge hit, but the game failed to live up to these expectations. The company then decided to delay the release of the next Assassin's Creed entry, Shadows, for further refinement. It admitted this was a result of "the learnings from the Star Wars Outlaws release." It also confirmed that the Star Wars adventure had a "softer than expected launch," selling only one million copies in the month since release.

The company cut its guidance for the financial year, expecting bookings to fall to around €1.95 billion ($2.1 billion). It also expects net booking for the fiscal second quarter to be down to €350 million to 370 million ($387 million to $410 million) from its previous forecast of €500 million euros ($554 million).

Permalink to story:

 
Who's gonna buy a bankrupt wreck of a company like Ubisoft after it gets artificially pumped? At the lowest price, maybe, but now? This is just a pump&dump scheme, run while you can kind of thing.
 

If they manage to release a good far cry or assassin game (doubt the second), their stock will improve. Of course, it has to be more than just 2 games. I would never argue that Ubi released perfect games.
But as someone who spent enough time in Far cry and Assasin's creed games, they are good enough to justify buying them.

Here is Ubi's problem. They released decent games. But lowering the quality of their games does not mean slightly worse games, it means the games they won't be able to get the money back.
They do not have space for making worse games, since their older games were far from perfect already.
It is enough for them to recover, to just go back to the quality and content they made.
But I think it is not possible right now because they did not just lower the quality. They preoccupy their time and money with things and subjects that do not bring joy to gamers, things that annoy them and literally turn away from Ubi's gamnes. Ubi is inflicting pain on itself. And a healthy way, or at least the first step, is to fire everybody who hates games and their customers, which would not be hard. They could just go to Xwitter account of each employ and figure out what each specific employee thinks of their company and customers alike.
 
Thick-eyed greed, thats all
as my green friend says - but thats none of my business
 
Ubisoft management is beyond stupid.
I don't even work in the gaming industry and I could have easily avoided all the stupid they managed to pull off.
 
Who's gonna buy a bankrupt wreck of a company like Ubisoft after it gets artificially pumped? At the lowest price, maybe, but now? This is just a pump&dump scheme, run while you can kind of thing.
I agree. Just another pump and dump scheme.
 
I agree. Just another pump and dump scheme.
There are always opportunistic people out there who will try and buy up something that they think will be worth more in the near future. It is a risk because if the deal falls through, you lose it all. Moreover, there is no guarantee that even if you buy it now, you will get more back when the company looking to sell itself no longer have any negotiation power.
 
Somebody interested in their trademarks: Assassin's Creed, Far Cry, Just Dance, Prince of Persia...
To be honest, these IPs were great at some point, but I am not sure if it is still worth picking them up now. A lot of game publishers are just milking a once successful IP to produce sequel or prequel, but they are just not that fun anymore. Look at Bethesda after being acquired by MS, and you can tell it hardly added any value with the "game to look forward to", Starfield, that did just ok. A lot of hype, but very little to give. And that's just one example of once well known game developers.
 
Step 1. Kill off Ubisoft Connect and return to Steam/Epic without the need to launch any Ubisoft apps.

Step 2. Don't put lootboxes and in-game store in all games, while asking AAA price (or higher) to begin with.
 
First order of business: Fire all the wokes
The poison pill is intended to destroy western capitalism. Proof Tensen is going to purchase Ubisoft at a fraction of what it was worth a few years back. Just look at look at who owns AMC movie theaters now. Even the last Terminator movie was made by Tensen.
 
They've been rebadging basically the same janky mediocre games with the same formula for over a decade. And the formula is basically busywork. Even the shills have finally cottoned on to it. Ubi are prisoners of their own IPs at this stage, they can't do anything creative as long as they're expected to churn out more of this dross.
I thought they were done for to be honest, but private ownership could offer a way out of this. I sincerely hope it works out for them.
 
They don't need a new owner. They just need better management. They shouldn't have to learn from their Star Wars release. They should have already known. They also need to be more customer-friendly. I'd probably buy a half-decent game from a publisher that was more customer-friendly. I try to avoid buying from Ubisoft and EA if there are other games I can spend my time and money on. Until they get better management, they won't improve.
 
Back